Many times predatory journals post the name of editors without their consent. Their are two other AME publications that have Australian editorsThis is a list of questionable, scholarly open-access publishers. SCIENCEDOMAIN international (SDI) publishes high-quality, OPEN peer-reviewed, OPEN access international journals in various sectors of science, technology and medicine (STM). 1228 Reviews by 755 Reviewers. But we strongly want to say that we don’t follow the predatory publication model.
We have no submission fees. 1108 Reviews by 407 Reviewers. The statements contained on the website are incorrect. Therefore, our process has enabled the society to be highly beneficial in the long run, opposite of some rumors which state that we at SCIENCEDOMAIN international are a predatory publisher. We recommend that scholars read the available reviews, assessments and descriptions provided here, and then decide for themselves whether they want to submit articles, serve as editors or on editorial boards. They have existed as an UK company twice, but both registrations have been dissolved (Reg. ‘Sciencedomain International’ is also a victim of the predatory publication model. Therefore, very politely we want to say that we may not have the strongest editors of the world, but we have a highly transparent and active editorial board to maintain the quality of the journal.Therefore Sciencedomain International took some proactive steps to fight against the predatory publication problem starting from 2011. Some distinguished operating principles of ‘Sciencedomain International’ are discussed below and the backgrounds of … Very politely we want to tell that our peer review system is not perfect. All peer review reports, comments of the editors and different versions of the manuscripts are also made publicly posted along with the published paper. This process eradicates any possibility of malicious interference by the publisher to publish papers only for money, by compromising academic quality. Read More . Confusion and mixing the name of ‘Sciencedomain International’ with low-quality predatory publishers harmed the brand image and business of ‘Sciencedomain International’ in many ways.Some distinguished operating principles of ‘Sciencedomain International’ are discussed below. ‘Sciencedomain International’ is also a victim of predatory publication model and many times ‘Sciencedomain International’ was labelled with “predatory” stamp, as ‘Sciencedomain International’ also follow open access publication model. They have existed as an UK company twice, but both registrations have been dissolved (Reg. I’m on holiday at the moment but will reply in detail in a few weeks. Details. I have edited your comment to remove libellous statements that have been taken directly from it. ... All these examples clearly stand against the working principle of some predatory publishers, who don’t provide any peer review service and don’t provide the basic services of a standard scholarly publisher. Along with the published paper, identity and comments of the academic editor are also published. We emphasize that journal publishers and journals change in their business and editorial practices over time. But nobody can deny the contribution of Mr. Beall to identify the black side of open access scholarly publication.All SDI journals have a transparent editorial board. Many academicians proved that Beall’s evaluation was biased and highly erroneous. Something calling itself “ScienceDomain International Ltd”, apparently of Third Floor, 207 Regent Street, London, W1B 3HH, continues to turn up in spamtraps. I have taken this list directly from Jeffrey Beall with no editing in order to preserve it. Can you give us an approach that we would adapt?We hope that tenure and promotion committees can also decide for themselves how importantly or not to rate articles published in these journals in the context of their own institutional standards and/or geocultural locus. No 08988029 – Dissolved on 24 November 2015). Journal.
I checked out your website after your email landed in my Junk folder. Many times ‘Sciencedomain International’ was labelled with “predatory” stamp, as Sciencedomain also follows open access publication model. ... ScienceDomain International also here. No 07794635 – Dissolved on 14 January 2014; Reg.